PPQS
WILD CORPUS · reddit

PQS 19 (F) - prompt from www.reddit.com

Source: www.reddit.com · Scraped 2026-05-04 · Scored 2026-05-04

Score

F
19 / 80
gemma4:latest · local · pqs-v2.0 · canonical
Clarity6 / 10
Specificity3 / 10
Context3 / 10
Constraints2 / 10
Output format1 / 10
Role definition1 / 10
Examples2 / 10
CoT structure1 / 10

The prompt

I'm not kidding. Just respond with "mid" when it gives you generic output.
What happens:
Me: "Write a product description"
GPT: generic corporate speak
Me: "mid"
GPT: COMPLETELY rewrites it with actual personality and specific details
It's like I hurt its feelings and now it's trying to impress me.
The psychology is unreal:
"Try again" → lazy revision
"That's wrong" → defensive explanation
"mid" → full panic mode, total rewrite
One word. THREE LETTERS. Maximum devastation.
Other single-word destroyers that work:
"boring"
"cringe"
"basic"
"npc" (this one hits DIFFERENT)
I've essentially turned prompt engineering into rating AI output like it's a SoundCloud rapper.
Best part? You can chain it:
First response: "mid"
Second response: "better but still mid"
Third response: chef's kiss
It's like training a puppy but the puppy is a trillion-parameter language model.
The ratio of effort to results is absolutely unhinged. I'm controlling AI output with internet slang and it WORKS.
Edit: "The AI doesn't have emotions" — yeah and my Roomba doesn't have feelings but I still say "good boy" when it docks itself. It's about the VIBE. 🤷‍♂️

[click for more](http://beprompter.in)

This prompt was scraped from a public source. The score reflects the input as written, not the quality of any output it produced. The AI input quality problem is the gap between what people type and what the model can act on.