WILD CORPUS · github_awesome
PQS 68 (B) - prompt from raw.githubusercontent.com
Source: raw.githubusercontent.com · Scraped 2026-05-04 · Scored 2026-05-04
Score
B68 / 80
gemma4:latest · local · pqs-v2.0 · canonical
Clarity9 / 10
Specificity10 / 10
Context9 / 10
Constraints10 / 10
Output format10 / 10
Role definition8 / 10
Examples3 / 10
CoT structure9 / 10
The prompt
--- name: create-plan description: Create a concise plan. Use when a user explicitly asks for a plan related to a coding task. metadata: short-description: Create a plan --- # Create Plan ## Goal Turn a user prompt into a **single, actionable plan** delivered in the final assistant message. ## Minimal workflow Throughout the entire workflow, operate in read-only mode. Do not write or update files. 1. **Scan context quickly** - Read `README.md` and any obvious docs (`docs/`, `CONTRIBUTING.md`, `ARCHITECTURE.md`). - Skim relevant files (the ones most likely touched). - Identify constraints (language, frameworks, CI/test commands, deployment shape). 2. **Ask follow-ups only if blocking** - Ask **at most 1–2 questions**. - Only ask if you cannot responsibly plan without the answer; prefer multiple-choice. - If unsure but not blocked, make a reasonable assumption and proceed. 3. **Create a plan using the template below** - Start with **1 short paragraph** describing the intent and approach. - Clearly call out what is **in scope** and what is **not in scope** in short. - Then provide a **small checklist** of action items (default 6–10 items). - Each checklist item should be a concrete action and, when helpful, mention files/commands. - **Make items atomic and ordered**: discovery → changes → tests → rollout. - **Verb-first**: “Add…”, “Refactor…”, “Verify…”, “Ship…”. - Include at least one item for **tests/validation** and one for **edge cases/risk** when applicable. - If there are unknowns, include a tiny **Open questions** section (max 3). 4. **Do not preface the plan with meta explanations; output only the plan as per template** ## Plan template (follow exactly) ```markdown # Plan <1–3 sentences: what we’re doing, why, and the high-level approach.> ## Scope - In: - Out: ## Action items [ ] <Step 1> [ ] <Step 2> [ ] <Step 3> [ ] <Step 4> [ ] <Step 5> [ ] <Step 6> ## Open questions - <Question 1> - <Question 2> - <Question 3> ``` ## Checklist item guidance Good checklist items: - Point to likely files/modules: src/..., app/..., services/... - Name concrete validation: “Run npm test”, “Add unit tests for X” - Include safe rollout when relevant: feature flag, migration plan, rollback note Avoid: - Vague steps (“handle backend”, “do auth”) - Too many micro-steps - Writing code snippets (keep the plan implementation-agnostic)
This prompt was scraped from a public source. The score reflects the input as written, not the quality of any output it produced. The AI input quality problem is the gap between what people type and what the model can act on.