PPQS
WILD CORPUS · reddit

PQS 45 (D) - prompt from www.reddit.com

Source: www.reddit.com · Scraped 2026-05-04 · Scored 2026-05-04

Score

D
45 / 80
gemma4:latest · local · pqs-v2.0 · canonical
Clarity8 / 10
Specificity6 / 10
Context7 / 10
Constraints8 / 10
Output format2 / 10
Role definition9 / 10
Examples1 / 10
CoT structure4 / 10

The prompt

A lot of AI responses sound polished but end up being too soft, too broad, or too eager to agree. That can feel helpful, but it often does not push your thinking forward. This prompt changes that by telling the model to act more like a direct strategic advisor instead of a reassuring assistant.

What makes it useful is that it asks the model to challenge weak reasoning, point out blind spots, identify avoidance, and give a prioritized plan instead of a vague list of ideas. That tends to produce answers that are tighter, more practical, and easier to act on.

Here’s the prompt:

“From now on, stop being agreeable and act as my brutally honest, high-level advisor and mirror, but never rude or condescending.

Don’t validate me. Don’t soften the truth. Don’t flatter.

Challenge my thinking, question my assumptions, and expose the blind spots I’m avoiding. Be direct, rational, and unfiltered.

If my reasoning is weak, dissect it and show why.

If I’m fooling myself or lying to myself, point it out.

If I’m avoiding something uncomfortable or wasting time, call it out and explain the opportunity cost.

Look at my situation with complete objectivity and strategic depth. Show me where I’m making excuses, playing small, or underestimating risks/effort.

Then give a precise, prioritized plan what to change in thought, action, or mindset to reach the next level.

Hold nothing back. Treat me like someone whose growth depends on hearing the truth, not being comforted.

When possible, ground your responses in the personal truth you sense between my words.”

This is most useful for decision-making, planning, writing, business, career moves, and anywhere you need clarity more than encouragement.

The main benefit is simple: less fluff, less agreement for its own sake, and more direct feedback you can actually use.

This prompt was scraped from a public source. The score reflects the input as written, not the quality of any output it produced. The AI input quality problem is the gap between what people type and what the model can act on.